↓ Skip to main content

Structure of the β2‐α2 loop and interspecies prion transmission

Overview of attention for article published in FASEB Journal, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structure of the β2‐α2 loop and interspecies prion transmission
Published in
FASEB Journal, April 2012
DOI 10.1096/fj.11-200923
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyrus Bett, Natalia Fernández‐Borges, Timothy D. Kurt, Melanie Lucero, K. Peter R. Nilsson, Joaquín Castilla, Christina J. Sigurdson

Abstract

Prions are misfolded, aggregated conformers of the prion protein that can be transmitted between species. The precise determinants of interspecies transmission remain unclear, although structural similarity between the infectious prion and host prion protein is required for efficient conversion to the misfolded conformer. The β2-α2 loop region of endogenous prion protein, PrP(C), has been implicated in barriers to prion transmission. We recently discovered that conversion was efficient when incoming and host prion proteins had similar β2-α2 loop structures; however, the roles of primary vs. secondary structural homology could not be distinguished. Here we uncouple the effect of primary and secondary structural homology of the β2-α2 loop on prion conversion. We inoculated prions from animals having a disordered or an ordered β2-α2 loop into mice having a disordered loop or an ordered loop due to a single residue substitution (D167S). We found that prion conversion was driven by a homologous primary structure and occurred independently of a homologous secondary structure. Similarly, cell-free conversion using PrP(C) from mice with disordered or ordered loops and prions from 5 species correlated with primary but not secondary structural homology of the loop. Thus, our findings support a model in which efficient interspecies prion conversion is determined by small stretches of the primary sequence rather than the secondary structure of PrP.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from FASEB Journal
#7,585
of 11,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,022
of 173,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FASEB Journal
#55
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.