↓ Skip to main content

Engineering geological conditions and protection of Olympic park territory in Sochi

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Engineering geological conditions and protection of Olympic park territory in Sochi
Published in
Water Resources, January 2012
DOI 10.1134/s0097807811070141
Authors

V. I. Osipov, O. A. Vadachkoriya, Yu. A. Mamaev, A. A. Yastrebov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,477,532
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources
#9
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,450
of 242,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them