↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with quality of services for marginalized groups with mental health problems in 14 European countries

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Factors associated with quality of services for marginalized groups with mental health problems in 14 European countries
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diogo Costa, Aleksandra Matanov, Reamonn Canavan, Edina Gabor, Tim Greacen, Petra Vondráčková, Ulrike Kluge, Pablo Nicaise, Jacek Moskalewicz, José Manuel Díaz–Olalla, Christa Straßmayr, Martijn Kikkert, Joaquim JF Soares, Andrea Gaddini, Henrique Barros, Stefan Priebe

Abstract

Different service characteristics are known to influence mental health care delivery. Much less is known about the impact of contextual factors, such as the socioeconomic circumstances, on the provision of care to socially marginalized groups.The objectives of this work were to assess the organisational characteristics of services providing mental health care for marginalized groups in 14 European capital cities and to explore the associations between organisational quality, service features and country-level characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Psychology 10 17%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,503,893
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,474
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,115
of 313,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#62
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.