↓ Skip to main content

Subclinical Myocardial Impairment in Metabolic Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
62 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subclinical Myocardial Impairment in Metabolic Diseases
Published in
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wojciech Kosmala, Prash Sanders, Thomas H. Marwick

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity are important contributors to nonischemic heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation. There is a 2- to 5-fold increase in HF associated with T2DM, and there is a 5% in HF risk in men and 7% increment in women for every unit increment in body mass index, after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Likewise, the risk of atrial fibrillation increases by about 6% per unit increase in body mass index. Metabolic cardiomyopathy leads to a number of changes in cardiac structure and function that can be recognized by imaging in the asymptomatic phase, and these parameters can be used for monitoring the progression of disease or the response to therapy. The purpose of this review is to familiarize clinicians with the potential benefits of early detection of preclinical myocardial abnormalities, as well as the mechanisms that might inform interventions to prevent disease progression in patients with T2DM and obesity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Other 12 13%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,130,687
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#352
of 2,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,568
of 330,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.