↓ Skip to main content

Screening of duplicated loci reveals hidden divergence patterns in a complex salmonid genome

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Ecology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening of duplicated loci reveals hidden divergence patterns in a complex salmonid genome
Published in
Molecular Ecology, July 2017
DOI 10.1111/mec.14201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morten T. Limborg, Wesley A. Larson, Lisa W. Seeb, James E. Seeb

Abstract

A whole genome duplication (WGD) doubles the entire genomic content of a species and is thought to have catalyzed adaptive radiation in some polyploid-origin lineages. However, little is known about general consequences of a WGD since gene duplicates (i.e. paralogs) are commonly filtered in genomic studies; such filtering may remove substantial portions of the genome in data sets from polyploid-origin species. We demonstrate a new method that enables genome-wide scans for signatures of selection at both non-duplicated and duplicated loci by taking locus-specific copy number into account. We apply this method to RAD sequence data from different ecotypes of a polyploid-origin salmonid (Oncorhynchus nerka) and reveal signatures of divergent selection that would have been missed if duplicated loci were filtered. We also find conserved signatures of elevated divergence at pairs of homeologous chromosomes with residual tetrasomic inheritance suggesting that joint evolution of some non-diverged gene duplicates may affect the adaptive potential of these genes. These findings illustrate that including duplicated loci in genomic analyses enables novel insights into the evolutionary consequences of WGDs and local segmental gene duplications. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 7 18%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,872,459
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Ecology
#4,813
of 6,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,379
of 317,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Ecology
#73
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.