| Title |
Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp08x279760 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kashifa Mahmood-Yousuf, Daniel Munday, Nigel King, Jeremy Dale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 24% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,694,094
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,515
of 4,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,624
of 82,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.