Title |
Bacteria-mediated bisphenol A degradation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00253-013-4949-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Weiwei Zhang, Kun Yin, Lingxin Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 202 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 16% |
Researcher | 18 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 36 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
Chemistry | 16 | 8% |
Engineering | 11 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 12% |
Unknown | 62 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,764,167
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,616
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,904
of 199,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#26
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.