| Title |
“Ayahuasca,” the South American hallucinogenic drink: An ethnobotanical and chemical investigation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, April 1972
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02860772 |
| Authors |
Laurent Rivier, Jan-Erik Lindgren |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 27% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,330,988
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#30
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56
of 3,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them