↓ Skip to main content

Frailty, polypharmacy, and potentially inappropriate medications in old people: findings in a representative sample of the French population

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Frailty, polypharmacy, and potentially inappropriate medications in old people: findings in a representative sample of the French population
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00228-017-2276-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Herr, Nicolas Sirven, Hélène Grondin, Sylvain Pichetti, Catherine Sermet

Abstract

This study analyses the relationship between medication use and frailty by considering the quantity of medications prescribed (polypharmacy) and the quality of medication prescribing (according to French criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medications-PIMs) in people aged 65 and over. This is a cross-sectional study based on the data from a nationally representative study about health and use of healthcare resources in France (ESPS 2012). The number of frailty criteria was assessed among exhaustion, unintentional weight loss, muscle weakness, impaired mobility, and low level of physical activity. Polypharmacy and PIMs were assessed from the data of reimbursement by the National Health Insurance over the whole year 2012. PIMs were defined according to the Laroche list plus additional criteria dealing with inappropriate prolonged use of medications. The analyses used Poisson regression models, with the number of frailty criteria as dependent variable. The study population was composed of 1003 women and 887 men, of mean age 74.7 +/- 7.4 years. Polypharmacy (5 to 9 drugs) and excessive polypharmacy (≥10 drugs) were reported in 42.9 and 27.4% of the study population, respectively, while 46.7% of the study population received at least one PIM during the year 2012. Polypharmacy and PIMs were both associated with the number of frailty criteria in models adjusted for socio-demographic and health characteristics of the participants. The prescription of anticholinergic medications was the only PIM that remained significantly associated with the number of frailty criteria after adjustment for polypharmacy. Polypharmacy and use of anticholinergic medications are independently associated with frailty in old people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 20 14%
Other 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 46 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,350,775
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1,959
of 2,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,047
of 317,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.