↓ Skip to main content

Stochastic Modeling of the Effects of Large-Scale Circulation on Daily Weather in the Southeastern U.S.

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Stochastic Modeling of the Effects of Large-Scale Circulation on Daily Weather in the Southeastern U.S.
Published in
Climatic Change, September 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1026054330406
Authors

Richard W. Katz, Marc B. Parlange, Claudia Tebaldi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 18%
Professor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 35%
Environmental Science 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Engineering 4 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,605
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,433
of 53,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.