You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Augmenting melodic intonation therapy with non-invasive brain stimulation to treat impaired left-hemisphere function: two case studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shahd Al-Janabi, Lyndsey A. Nickels, Paul F. Sowman, Hana Burianová, Dawn L. Merrett, William F. Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#23,792
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,826
of 324,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#150
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.