↓ Skip to main content

The evolutionary history of vertebrate cranial placodes – I: Cell type evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Biology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolutionary history of vertebrate cranial placodes – I: Cell type evolution
Published in
Developmental Biology, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.01.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cedric Patthey, Gerhard Schlosser, Sebastian M. Shimeld

Abstract

Vertebrate cranial placodes are crucial contributors to the vertebrate cranial sensory apparatus. Their evolutionary origin has attracted much attention from evolutionary and developmental biologists, yielding speculation and hypotheses concerning their putative homologues in other lineages and the developmental and genetic innovations that might have underlain their origin and diversification. In this article we first briefly review our current understanding of placode development and the cell types and structures they form. We next summarise previous hypotheses of placode evolution, discussing their strengths and caveats, before considering the evolutionary history of the various cell types that develop from placodes. In an accompanying review, we also further consider the evolution of ectodermal patterning. Drawing on data from vertebrates, tunicates, amphioxus, other bilaterians and cnidarians, we build these strands into a scenario of placode evolutionary history and of the genes, cells and developmental processes that underlie placode evolution and development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 118 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 9 7%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 27%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 18 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Biology
#4,816
of 5,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,272
of 322,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Biology
#26
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,557 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.