| Title |
Development and application of genomic tools to the restoration of green abalone in southern California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-013-0524-5 |
| Authors |
K. M. Gruenthal, D. A. Witting, T. Ford, M. J. Neuman, J. P. Williams, D. J. Pondella, A. Bird, N. Caruso, J. R. Hyde, L. W. Seeb, W. A. Larson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 22% |
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,484,343
of 24,914,266 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#794
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,615
of 205,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,914,266 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.