Title |
Application of the fastest route algorithm in the interactive simulation of the effect of local ischemia on the ECG
|
---|---|
Published in |
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, September 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11517-008-0391-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter M. van Dam, Thom F. Oostendorp, Adriaan van Oosterom |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 24% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#57
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,818
of 95,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.