↓ Skip to main content

Interval scheduling and colorful independent sets

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scheduling, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Interval scheduling and colorful independent sets
Published in
Journal of Scheduling, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10951-014-0398-5
Authors

René van Bevern, Matthias Mnich, Rolf Niedermeier, Mathias Weller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Lecturer 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 61%
Mathematics 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2014.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#92
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,055
of 255,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them