| Title |
Toward Low-Cost, High-Energy Density, and High-Power Density Lithium-Ion Batteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOM, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11837-017-2404-9 |
| Authors |
Jianlin Li, Zhijia Du, Rose E. Ruther, Seong Jin AN, Lamuel Abraham David, Kevin Hays, Marissa Wood, Nathan D. Phillip, Yangping Sheng, Chengyu Mao, Sergiy Kalnaus, Claus Daniel, David L. Wood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 337 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 19% |
| Researcher | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 124 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 57 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 45 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 40 | 12% |
| Energy | 21 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 143 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#132
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,137
of 320,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.