↓ Skip to main content

Interaction design guidelines on critiquing-based recommender systems

Overview of attention for article published in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Interaction design guidelines on critiquing-based recommender systems
Published in
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11257-008-9057-x
Authors

Li Chen, Pearl Pu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 103 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 30%
Student > Master 28 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 65 56%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 9%
Engineering 9 8%
Psychology 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 14 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
#85
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,270
of 92,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.