| Title |
Assessing Interaction Dynamics in the Context of Robot Programming by Demonstration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Social Robotics, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12369-013-0204-0 |
| Authors |
Ana Lucia Pais, Brenna D. Argall, Aude G. Billard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 38% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 19% |
| Psychology | 5 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,531,132
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Social Robotics
#189
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,417
of 198,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Social Robotics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.