You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Climate change cascades: Shifts in oceanography, species' ranges and subtidal marine community dynamics in eastern Tasmania
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology & Ecology, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.02.032 |
Authors |
Craig R. Johnson, Sam C. Banks, Neville S. Barrett, Fabienne Cazassus, Piers K. Dunstan, Graham J. Edgar, Stewart D. Frusher, Caleb Gardner, Malcolm Haddon, Fay Helidoniotis, Katy L. Hill, Neil J. Holbrook, Graham W. Hosie, Peter R. Last, Scott D. Ling, Jessica Melbourne-Thomas, Karen Miller, Gretta T. Pecl, Anthony J. Richardson, Ken R. Ridgway, Stephen R. Rintoul, David A. Ritz, D. Jeff Ross, J. Craig Sanderson, Scoresby A. Shepherd, Anita Slotwinski, Kerrie M. Swadling, Nyan Taw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 23 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
United States | 5 | 7% |
Chile | 3 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
American Samoa | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 34 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 48 | 63% |
Scientists | 27 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 730 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 8 | 1% |
United States | 8 | 1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | <1% |
Unknown | 697 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 143 | 20% |
Researcher | 126 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 109 | 15% |
Student > Master | 106 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 4% |
Other | 99 | 14% |
Unknown | 120 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 285 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 194 | 27% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 42 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
Other | 42 | 6% |
Unknown | 141 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#307,195
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Marine Biology & Ecology
#6
of 2,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#970
of 123,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Marine Biology & Ecology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.