↓ Skip to main content

Familiality of female and male homosexuality

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, July 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Familiality of female and male homosexuality
Published in
Behavior Genetics, July 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01067431
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Michael Bailey, Alan P. Bell

Abstract

We examined data from a large cohort of homosexual and heterosexual females and males concerning their siblings' sexual orientations. As in previous studies, both male and female homosexuality were familial. Homosexual females had an excess of homosexual brothers compared to heterosexual subjects, thus providing evidence that similar familial factors influence both male and female homosexuality. Furthermore, despite the large sample size, homosexual females and males did not differ significantly from each other in their proportions of either homosexual sisters or homosexual brothers. Thus, results were most consistent with the possibility that similar familial factors influence male and female sexual orientation. However, because results conflicted with those of some other studies, and because siblings' sexual orientations were obtained in a manner likely to yield more errors than in these other, smaller studies, further work is needed using large samples and more careful methods before the degree of cofamiliality of male and female homosexuality can be resolved definitively. We also examined whether some parental influences comprised shared environmental effects on sexual orientation. Scales attempting to measure such influences failed to distinguish subjects with homosexual siblings from subjects with only heterosexual siblings and, thus, did not appear to measure shared environmental determinants of sexual orientation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 28%
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 34%
Social Sciences 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,498,935
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#301
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,224
of 19,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.