↓ Skip to main content

Learning to learn in informal science settings

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Science Education, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Learning to learn in informal science settings
Published in
Research in Science Education, December 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02356336
Authors

Janette Griffin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Chile 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Materials Science 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,045,808
of 24,185,663 outputs
Outputs from Research in Science Education
#133
of 683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,840
of 78,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Science Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,185,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 683 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them