↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Care Related to Post-Operative Radiotherapy for Patients with Prostate Cancer among Canadian Radiation Oncologists and Urologists

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of Care Related to Post-Operative Radiotherapy for Patients with Prostate Cancer among Canadian Radiation Oncologists and Urologists
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13187-017-1230-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonnie Bristow, Mohammed Aldehaim, Katija Bonin, Candice Chee Ka Lam, Stephanie J. Wan, Xingshan Cao, Ewa Szumacher

Abstract

The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and American Urological Association (AUA) developed post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) guidelines to aid patient counseling on adjuvant (ART) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT). Our study compared how aware and compliant Canadian radiation oncologists and urologists are to these guidelines. Our online survey was distributed through the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (CARO) and Canadian Urology Association (CUA) to radiation oncologists and urologists that treat prostate cancer. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Chi-square test to compare radiation oncologists and urologists. P values for significant findings are reported. A total of 128 participants responded the survey, 52 radiation oncologists, and 76 urologists. The majority (82%) of radiation oncologists had read these guidelines, compared to only 49% of urologists (p < 0.001). Radiation oncologists were more likely to recommend ART >50% for adverse pathological findings post-radical prostatectomy compared to urologists (76 vs. 51%, p = 0.011). Urologists were more likely to monitor their patient's PSA level post-prostatectomy compared to radiation oncologists (93 vs. 77%, p = 0.016). Post-thematic analysis of open-ended questions revealed that urologists rarely refer patients to radiation oncologists for ART, with radiation oncologists confirming that they rarely receive referrals. This study demonstrates the low compliance to ASTRO/AUA guidelines. While radiation oncologists were more aware and compliant to guidelines, urologists were significantly more likely to monitor their patient's PSA. This study highlighted the need for better communication between urologists and radiation oncologists, especially in referrals for ART, to facilitate treatment delivery that is concordant with ASTRO/AUA guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 31%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 9 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,134,549
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#519
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,745
of 323,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.