| Title |
Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-008-9546-1 |
| Authors |
Tommi Tervonen, Igor Linkov, José Rui Figueira, Jeffery Steevens, Mark Chappell, Myriam Merad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 161 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 27% |
| Researcher | 36 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 12% |
| Engineering | 19 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 27% |
| Unknown | 31 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,018,181
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#24
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,396
of 102,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.