↓ Skip to main content

Identifying perceived barriers to monitoring service quality among substance abuse treatment providers in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying perceived barriers to monitoring service quality among substance abuse treatment providers in South Africa
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-14-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bronwyn Myers, Zainonisa Petersen, Rehana Kader, J Randy Koch, Ron Manderscheid, Rajen Govender, Charles DH Parry

Abstract

A performance measurement system is planned for South African substance abuse treatment services. Provider-level barriers to implementing these systems have been identified in the United States, but little is known about the nature of these barriers in South Africa. This study explored the willingness of South African substance abuse treatment providers' to adopt a performance measurement system and perceived barriers to monitoring service quality that would need to be addressed during system development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Psychology 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,170,238
of 23,342,664 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,805
of 4,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,779
of 310,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#68
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.