Title |
Determination of the Ca/P ratio in calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite using X-ray diffraction analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, March 1993
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00120386 |
Authors |
K. Ishikawa, P. Ducheyne, S. Radin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Israel | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 25% |
Researcher | 25 | 20% |
Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 32 | 25% |
Chemistry | 22 | 17% |
Engineering | 16 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,219,902
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#1,288
of 1,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,946
of 20,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.