| Title |
Health Technology Assessment for Policy Making in India: Current Scenario and Way Forward
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PharmacoEconomics - Open, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s41669-017-0037-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shankar Prinja, Laura E. Downey, Vijay K. Gauba, Soumya Swaminathan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 46% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,101,256
of 24,593,959 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics - Open
#56
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,256
of 322,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics - Open
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.