↓ Skip to main content

Recovery of high purity precious metals from printed circuit boards

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hazardous Materials, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
388 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recovery of high purity precious metals from printed circuit boards
Published in
Journal of Hazardous Materials, September 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Young Jun Park, Derek J. Fray

Abstract

Waste printed circuit boards (WPCB) have an inherent value because of the precious metal content. For an effective recycling of WPCB, it is essential to recover the precious metals. This paper reports a promising method to recover the precious metals. Aqua regia was used as a leachant and the ratio between metals and leachant was fixed at 1/20 (g/ml). Silver is relatively stable so the amount of about 98 wt.% of the input was recovered without an additional treatment. Palladium formed a red precipitate during dissolution, which were consisted of Pd(NH(4))(2)Cl(6). The amount precipitated was 93 wt.% of the input palladium. A liquid-liquid extraction with toluene was used to extract gold selectively. Also, dodecanethiol and sodium borohydride solution were added to make gold nanoparticles. Gold of about 97 wt.% of the input was recovered as nanoparticles which was identified with a high-resolution transmission electron microscopy through selected area electron diffraction and nearest-neighbor lattice spacing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 485 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 104 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 17%
Student > Bachelor 69 14%
Researcher 47 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 66 13%
Unknown 97 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 118 24%
Chemistry 82 16%
Environmental Science 47 9%
Chemical Engineering 44 9%
Materials Science 41 8%
Other 45 9%
Unknown 123 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#863,979
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#134
of 7,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,836
of 99,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.