↓ Skip to main content

When to perform bone scintigraphy in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer? a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
When to perform bone scintigraphy in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer? a retrospective study
Published in
BMC Urology, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12894-017-0229-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiwei Lin, Qiqi Mao, Bin Chen, Liujiang Wang, Ben Liu, Xiangyi Zheng, Liping Xie

Abstract

To determine when a bone scintigraphy investigation is appropriate in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). We retrospectively reviewed 703 newly diagnosed PCa patients who were referred for bone scintigraphy. The association between age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS) and bone scintigraphy result were investigated by series of crude or stratified analysis. Overall, 15.08% (106/703) patients had bone metastases. PSA and GS between positive bone scan group and negative bone scan group were significantly different, while age was not. The incidence of bone metastasis in patient with PSA < 20 ng/ml or GS < 8 was less than 10%, but increased dramatically with rising PSA and upgrading GS. In multivariate analysis, PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml (OR = 5.10, 95%CI (2.12-12.27)) and GS ≥ 8 (OR = 3.61, 95%CI (1.55-8.41)) were independently predictive of positive bone scan. Patients with PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml or GS ≥ 8 were in higher risk of bone metastasis, bone scintigraphy was recommended. But a bone scintigraphy is of limited value in PCa patients with PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml and GS ≤ 7.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Computer Science 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,557,147
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#323
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,599
of 317,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.