↓ Skip to main content

Human and entomological surveillance of West Nile fever, dengue and chikungunya in Veneto Region, Italy, 2010-2012

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Human and entomological surveillance of West Nile fever, dengue and chikungunya in Veneto Region, Italy, 2010-2012
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-60
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Gobbi, Gioia Capelli, Andrea Angheben, Mario Giobbia, Mario Conforto, Marzia Franzetti, Anna Maria Cattelan, Enzo Raise, Pierangelo Rovere, Paolo Mulatti, Fabrizio Montarsi, Andrea Drago, Luisa Barzon, Giuseppina Napoletano, Francesca Zanella, Francesca Pozza, Francesca Russo, Paolo Rosi, Giorgio Palù, Zeno Bisoffi, Summer Fever Study Group

Abstract

Since 2010 Veneto region (North-Eastern Italy) planned a special integrated surveillance of summer fevers to promptly identify cases of West Nile Fever (WNF), dengue (DENV) and chikungunya (CHIKV). The objectives of this study were (i) To increase the detection rate of imported CHIKV and DENV cases in travellers from endemic areas and promptly identify potential autochthonous cases.(ii) To detect autochthonous cases of WNF, besides those of West Nile Neuroinvasive Disease (WNND) that were already included in a national surveillance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Italy 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 102 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,245,371
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#646
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,011
of 312,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#10
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.