| Title |
An operational definition of essential biodiversity variables
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1386-9 |
| Authors |
Dirk S. Schmeller, Jean-Baptiste Mihoub, Anne Bowser, Christos Arvanitidis, Mark J. Costello, Miguel Fernandez, Gary N. Geller, Donald Hobern, W. Daniel Kissling, Eugenie Regan, Hannu Saarenmaa, Eren Turak, Nick J. B. Isaac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 60 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,995,605
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#851
of 2,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,253
of 321,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.