↓ Skip to main content

Plasma levels of soluble amyloid precursor protein β in symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Plasma levels of soluble amyloid precursor protein β in symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00406-017-0815-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Alexopoulos, Lena-Sophie Gleixner, Lukas Werle, Felix Buhl, Nathalie Thierjung, Evangelia Giourou, Simone M. Kagerbauer, Philippos Gourzis, Hubert Kübler, Timo Grimmer, Igor Yakushev, Jan Martin, Alexander Kurz, Robert Perneczky

Abstract

The established biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) require invasive endeavours or presuppose sophisticated technical equipment. Consequently, new biomarkers are needed. Here, we report that plasma levels of soluble amyloid precursor protein β (sAPPβ), a protein of the initial phase of the amyloid cascade, were significantly lower in patients with symptomatic AD (21 with mild cognitive impairment due to AD and 44 with AD dementia) with AD-typical cerebral hypometabolic pattern compared with 27 cognitively healthy elderly individuals without preclinical AD. These findings yield further evidence for the potential of sAPPβ in plasma as an AD biomarker candidate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Neuroscience 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,420,608
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#187
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,471
of 318,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.