↓ Skip to main content

Used‐habitat calibration plots: a new procedure for validating species distribution, resource selection, and step‐selection models

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
88 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Used‐habitat calibration plots: a new procedure for validating species distribution, resource selection, and step‐selection models
Published in
Ecography, August 2017
DOI 10.1111/ecog.03123
Authors

John R. Fieberg, James D. Forester, Garrett M. Street, Douglas H. Johnson, Althea A. ArchMiller, Jason Matthiopoulos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 286 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 20%
Student > Master 56 20%
Researcher 55 19%
Other 14 5%
Student > Bachelor 13 5%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 44%
Environmental Science 64 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 81 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#842,301
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#192
of 2,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,059
of 326,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.