↓ Skip to main content

Teacher Characteristics and Peer Victimization in Elementary Schools: A Classroom-Level Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Teacher Characteristics and Peer Victimization in Elementary Schools: A Classroom-Level Perspective
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10802-013-9847-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beau Oldenburg, Marijtje van Duijn, Miranda Sentse, Gijs Huitsing, Rozemarijn van der Ploeg, Christina Salmivalli, René Veenstra

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between teacher characteristics and peer victimization in elementary schools. We used data of 3,385 elementary school students (M age = 9.8) and 139 of their teachers (M age = 43.9) and employed Poisson regression analyses to explain the classroom victimization rate. Results showed a higher victimization rate in the classrooms of teachers who attributed bullying to external factors-factors outside of their control. In addition, the results suggest that both teachers' perceived ability to handle bullying among students and teachers' own bullying history were positively associated with the classroom victimization rate. We also took into account classroom composition characteristics and found lower victimization rates in multi-grade classrooms and in classrooms with older students. The results support the notion of an association between teacher characteristics and peer victimization. Findings are discussed with regards to current literature and suggestions for future research are made.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 29%
Social Sciences 27 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 36 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,130,392
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#177
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,601
of 318,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.