You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aspirin, Nonaspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug, and Acetaminophen Use and Risk of Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Pooled Analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djt431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Britton Trabert, Roberta B. Ness, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic, Megan A. Murphy, Ellen L. Goode, Elizabeth M. Poole, Louise A. Brinton, Penelope M. Webb, Christina M. Nagle, Susan J. Jordan, Harvey A. Risch, Mary Anne Rossing, Jennifer A. Doherty, Marc T. Goodman, Galina Lurie, Susanne K. Kjær, Estrid Hogdall, Allan Jensen, Daniel W. Cramer, Kathryn L. Terry, Allison Vitonis, Elisa V. Bandera, Sara Olson, Melony G. King, Urmila Chandran, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Usha Menon, Simon A. Gayther, Susan J. Ramus, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Anna H. Wu, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Malcolm C. Pike, Andrew Berchuck, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Nicolas Wentzensen |
| Abstract |
Regular aspirin use is associated with reduced risk of several malignancies. Epidemiologic studies analyzing aspirin, nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and acetaminophen use and ovarian cancer risk have been inconclusive. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#199,607
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#136
of 7,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,790
of 322,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#3
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.