↓ Skip to main content

The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
368 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, February 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria B Boyce, John P Browne, Joanne Greenhalgh

Abstract

To synthesise qualitative studies that investigated the experiences of healthcare professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to improve the quality of care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 360 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 16%
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Other 22 6%
Other 70 19%
Unknown 79 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 16%
Psychology 28 8%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 3%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 97 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,139,892
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#873
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,281
of 322,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.