| Title |
China's Largest Scale Ecological Migration in the Three-River Headwater Region
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-010-0054-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zongming Wang, Kaishan Song, Liangjun Hu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 28% |
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,560,795
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#269
of 1,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,246
of 96,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.