↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of human N‐ and T‐type calcium channels by an ortho‐phenoxyanilide derivative, MONIRO‐1

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Pharmacology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibition of human N‐ and T‐type calcium channels by an ortho‐phenoxyanilide derivative, MONIRO‐1
Published in
British Journal of Pharmacology, July 2017
DOI 10.1111/bph.13910
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey R McArthur, Leonid Motin, Ellen C Gleeson, Sandro Spiller, Richard J Lewis, Peter J Duggan, Kellie L Tuck, David J Adams

Abstract

Voltage-gated calcium channels are involved in peripheral and central nervous system nociception. N-type (Cav 2.2) and T-type (Cav 3.1, Cav 3.2 and Cav 3.3) voltage-gated calcium channels are particularly important in studying and treating pain and epilepsy. In this study, whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology was used to assess the potency and mechanism of action of a novel ortho-phenoxylanilide derivative, MONIRO-1, against a panel of voltage-gated calcium channels including Cav 1.2, Cav 1.3, Cav 2.1, Cav 2.2, Cav 2.3, Cav 3.1, Cav 3.2 and Cav 3.3. MONIRO-1 was 5-20-fold more potent at inhibiting human T-type calcium channels, hCav 3.1, hCav 3.2 and hCav 3.3 (IC50 : 3.3 ± 0.3 μM, 1.7 ± 0.1 μM, and 7.2 ± 0.3 μM, respectively) than N-type calcium channel, hCav 2.2 (IC50 : 34.0 ± 3.6 μM). It interacts with L-type calcium channels Cav 1.2 and Cav 1.3 with significantly lower potency (IC50 >100 μM), and does not inhibit hCav 2.1 or hCav 2.3 at concentrations as high as 100 μM. Interestingly, state- and use-dependent inhibition of hCav 2.2 was observed, whereas stronger inhibition occurred at high stimulation frequencies for hCav 3.1 suggesting a different mode of action between these two channels. Selectivity, potency, reversibility and multi-modal effects distinguish MONIRO-1 from other small molecule inhibitors acting on Cav channels involved in pain and/or epilepsy pathways. For both hCav 2.2 and hCav 3.1, high frequency firing increases the affinity for MONIRO-1 for both channels. Such Cav channel modulators have potential clinical use in the treatment of epilepsies, neuropathic pain and other nociceptive pathophysiologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Lecturer 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Chemistry 3 13%
Neuroscience 3 13%
Computer Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#19,869,877
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Pharmacology
#6,683
of 7,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,306
of 318,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Pharmacology
#69
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.