↓ Skip to main content

CO2 and CH4 emissions from streams in a lake‐rich landscape: Patterns, controls, and regional significance

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CO2 and CH4 emissions from streams in a lake‐rich landscape: Patterns, controls, and regional significance
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/2013gb004661
Authors

John T. Crawford, Noah R. Lottig, Emily H. Stanley, John F. Walker, Paul C. Hanson, Jacques C. Finlay, Robert G. Striegl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Canada 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 112 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 28%
Student > Master 23 19%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 53 44%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 14%
Unspecified 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2014.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#1,816
of 1,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,593
of 239,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.