↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic findings in uninvestigated dyspepsia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Endoscopic findings in uninvestigated dyspepsia
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-14-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Jehuda Faintuch, Fernando Marcuz Silva, Tomás Navarro-Rodriguez, Ricardo Correa Barbuti, Claudio Lyoiti Hashimoto, Alessandra Rita Asayama Lopes Rossini, Marcio Augusto Diniz, Jaime Natan Eisig

Abstract

It is important to know the causes of dyspepsia to establish the therapeutic approach. Dyspepsia is a frequent syndrome in our country, where there are restrictions to endoscopy and high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. This study aimed to assess the endoscopic findings of the syndrome, in an outpatient screening clinic of a tertiary hospital in São Paulo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,129
of 1,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,449
of 307,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.