↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative comparison between crowd models for evacuation planning and evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal de Physique I, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative comparison between crowd models for evacuation planning and evaluation
Published in
Journal de Physique I, February 2014
DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2014-40699-x
Authors

Vaisagh Viswanathan, Chong Eu Lee, Michael Harold Lees, Siew Ann Cheong, Peter M. A. Sloot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Panama 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 15%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor 5 7%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 28%
Engineering 12 18%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,526,509
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#112
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,154
of 323,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.