↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial susceptibility/resistance and genetic characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeaeisolates from Poland, 2010-2012

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Antimicrobial susceptibility/resistance and genetic characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeaeisolates from Poland, 2010-2012
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beata Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, Agnieszka Beata Serwin, Daniel Golparian, Szymon Walter de Walthoffen, Slawomir Majewski, Marta Koper, Magdalena Malejczyk, Marius Domeika, Magnus Unemo

Abstract

In Poland, gonorrhoea has been a mandatorily reported infection since 1948, however, the reported incidences are likely underestimated. No antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data for Neisseria gonorrhoeae has been internationally reported in nearly four decades, and data concerning genetic characteristics of N. gonorrhoeae are totally lacking. The aims of this study were to investigate the AMR to previously and currently recommended gonorrhoea treatment options, the main genetic resistance determinant (penA) for extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs), and genotypic distribution of N. gonorrhoeae isolates in Poland in 2010-2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,773,697
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,059
of 7,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,423
of 307,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#83
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.