↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of left ventricular contraction patterns using gated SPECT MPI to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of left ventricular contraction patterns using gated SPECT MPI to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12350-017-0949-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ningchao Tao, Yuanhao Qiu, Haipeng Tang, Zhiyong Qian, Hongping Wu, Rui Zhu, Yao Wang, Xiaofeng Hou, Weihua Zhou, Jiangang Zou

Abstract

The U-shaped left ventricular (LV) contraction pattern, identified by MRI or echocardiography, is associated with improved CRT response. Gated SPECT MPI can measure both myocardial viability and mechanical dyssynchrony in a single scan. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship of the LV contraction pattern and the response of CRT in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Fifty-eight patients who met CRT guidelines and who had pre-CRT MPI were enrolled. Myocardial segments with tracer uptake < 50% of maximum were considered as scar. The LV contraction pattern was considered as U-shaped or non-U-shaped (U-shaped has a block line in the direction of contraction propagation). CRT response was defined as an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 5% after 6-month follow-up. Twenty-eight patients (48%) had a U-shaped contraction pattern and thirty patients (52%) had a non-U-shaped contraction pattern. The U-shaped group showed a significantly higher response rate than the non-U-shaped group (90% vs. 57%; P = 0.005). By univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, the U-shaped pattern was an independent predictor of CRT response. Non-invasive gated SPECT MPI can characterize LV mechanical contraction patterns. A U-shaped contraction pattern identified is associated with improved CRT response. This may prove useful for improved patient selection for CRT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 37%
Computer Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,124
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,616
of 331,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#23
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.