↓ Skip to main content

Chinese and Iranian Scientific Publications: Fast Growth and Poor Ethics

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 974)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
45 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Chinese and Iranian Scientific Publications: Fast Growth and Poor Ethics
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11948-016-9766-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Student > Master 4 12%
Librarian 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 15%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Computer Science 3 9%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#722,562
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#37
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,057
of 330,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.