↓ Skip to main content

Hydration-induced crystalline transformation of starch polymer under ambient conditions

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydration-induced crystalline transformation of starch polymer under ambient conditions
Published in
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongling Qiao, Binjia Zhang, Jing Huang, Fengwei Xie, David K. Wang, Fatang Jiang, Siming Zhao, Jie Zhu

Abstract

With synchrotron small/wide-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS/WAXS), we revealed that post-harvest hydration at ambient conditions can further alter the starch crystalline structure. The hydration process induced the alignment of starch helices into crystalline lamellae, irrespective of the starch type (A- or B-). In this process, non-crystalline helices were probably packed with water molecules to form new crystal units, thereby enhancing the overall concentration of starch crystallinity. In particular, a fraction of the monoclinic crystal units of the A-type starches encapsulated water molecules during hydration, leading to the outward movement of starch helices. Such movement resulted in the transformation of monoclinic units into hexagonal units, which was associated with the B-type crystallites. Hence, the hydration under ambient conditions could enhance the B-polymorphic features for both A-type and B-type starches. The new knowledge obtained here may guide the design of biopolymer-based liquid crystal materials with controlled lattice regularity and demanded features.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 21%
Chemistry 7 16%
Chemical Engineering 5 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Materials Science 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
#2,709
of 7,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,683
of 324,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
#48
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.