↓ Skip to main content

Reversible diabetes mellitus induced by use of, and improved after discontinuation of, the antiretroviral medication zidovudine: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Reversible diabetes mellitus induced by use of, and improved after discontinuation of, the antiretroviral medication zidovudine: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1326-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kentaro Iwata, Wataru Ogawa

Abstract

With the advent of effective antiretroviral therapy, the care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection became more like that of other chronic diseases. Diabetes mellitus can also occur as one of the chronic illnesses affecting patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. We report a case of newly developed diabetes mellitus in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection, most likely caused by the nucleoside analogue zidovudine, and its improvement after discontinuation of zidovudine. A Chinese man in his 30s visited our outpatient clinic for routine follow-up of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Blood tests showed hyperglycemia with a glucose level of 31.8 mmol/L and hemoglobin A1c of 8.5%. He was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and treated with oral diabetic medications. The use of zidovudine was suspected as the cause of his diabetes, and it was replaced by other antiretroviral medication. His hyperglycemia improved, and he now no longer requires diabetic medications. Diabetes mellitus can develop with the use of antiretroviral medications, but its occurrence associated with use of zidovudine is quite rare. Healthcare personnel should be aware of this rare, yet important, side effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,288,676
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,106
of 3,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,815
of 317,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#13
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,941 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.