↓ Skip to main content

自由民権運動と武術についての一考察

Overview of attention for article published in Research Journal of Budo, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 240)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
自由民権運動と武術についての一考察
Published in
Research Journal of Budo, February 2000
DOI 10.11214/budo1968.32.2_1
Authors

湯浅 晃

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,267,105
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Research Journal of Budo
#23
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,599
of 111,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Journal of Budo
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them