↓ Skip to main content

Failure and Delay in Treatment-Seeking Across Anxiety Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 1,381)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Failure and Delay in Treatment-Seeking Across Anxiety Disorders
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10597-012-9543-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily M. Johnson, Meredith E. Coles

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are a significant mental health problem. Despite the availability of effective treatments most sufferers do not seek help. The current study assesses delays in treatment-seeking, failure to seek treatment, and reasons for delaying treatment for individuals with anxiety disorders. Data were drawn from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiological Surveys including 3,805 participants and analyses focused on treatment-seeking variables. Results indicate that individuals with anxiety disorders are less likely to seek treatment from a professional and more likely to experience delays in obtaining both any treatment, and effective treatment, than individuals with other forms of mental illness (in this case unipolar depression or substance use disorders). Deficits in mental health literacy (knowledge and beliefs about mental illness) were commonly endorsed as reasons for having delayed seeking treatment. The current study highlights the importance of improving knowledge about anxiety disorders to improve treatment-seeking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 122 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 13 10%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,160,489
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#33
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,775
of 191,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.