| Title |
Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Health Sciences Education, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10459-014-9494-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geoff Norman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 18% |
| Canada | 13 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Kuwait | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 46% |
| Scientists | 24 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 186 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 15% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 60 | 30% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 41% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 16% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#776,970
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#6
of 948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,177
of 324,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.