| Title |
Core elements of general supportive care for patients with sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-017-4831-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mervyn Mer, Marcus J. Schultz, Neill K. Adhikari, For the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Global Intensive Care Working Group and the Mahidol–Oxford Research Unit (MORU), Bangkok, Thailand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 4 | 17% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 26% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,228,938
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,614
of 5,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,904
of 317,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#44
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.