↓ Skip to main content

Gluten- and casein-free diet and autism spectrum disorders in children: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
Title
Gluten- and casein-free diet and autism spectrum disorders in children: a systematic review
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00394-017-1483-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Piwowarczyk, Andrea Horvath, Jan Łukasik, Ewa Pisula, Hania Szajewska

Abstract

Effective treatments for core symptoms of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are lacking. We systematically updated evidence on the effectiveness of a gluten-free and casein-free (GFCF) diet as a treatment for ASD in children. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched up until August 2016, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs); additional references were obtained from reviewed articles. Six RCTs (214 participants) were included. With few exceptions, there were no statistically significant differences in autism spectrum disorder core symptoms between groups, as measured by standardized scales. One trial found that compared with the control group, in the GFCF diet group there were significant improvements in the scores for the 'communication' subdomain of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and for the 'social interaction' subdomain of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale. Another trial found significant differences between groups in the post-intervention scores for the 'autistic traits', 'communication', and 'social contact' subdomains of a standardized Danish scheme. The remaining differences, if present, referred to parent-based assessment tools or other developmental/ASD-related features. No adverse events associated with a GFCF diet were reported. Overall, there is little evidence that a GFCF diet is beneficial for the symptoms of ASD in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 331 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 66 20%
Student > Master 33 10%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 123 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 54 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 14%
Psychology 24 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 134 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#295,410
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#97
of 2,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,155
of 332,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.